Tom Dahlin/Getty Images
Minnesota Vikings is the market for a new sports stadium. If a building can be constructed without a roof, says the team, it will pay for a third of the total cost.
It sounds like a nice proposition in a situation where a roughly $ 700 million expense is involved. But it is the best solution?
For Vikings fans is the primary goal to keep their team in Minnesota. If an outdoor Stadium showed the task, few would argue with the return to the team's glory years option — outside, like old Metropolitan Stadium.
On the other hand, if so much money will be used on a new stadium, why not just a few finishing touches? Most legislators want the building must be available for a multitude of uses, 365 days a year. If you add a tag will get a Bill through the legislature, how about making it retractable so that all win?
Vikings head coach Leslie Frazier expressed favor (I guess, there is a conflict of interest in the Organization) that ye shall keep a lid on the team facility — of course, quote the "bottling" crowd noise as a great advantage on the Vikings home games.
But in an outdoor design such as the Seattle Seahawks have created as one of, if not the noisy Stadium in National Football League, it stands to reason the Vikings could conjure up a similar situation.
Crumbling Hubert h. Humphrey Metrodome Vikings lease expires at the end of the coming season, 2011, so that a decision must be made as soon as possible. Otherwise, the looming threat of relocating the team to another city like Los Angeles, seems a viable — albeit uncomfortable — option for your organization.
This article is an offensive duplicate plagiarized What is the duplicate article?Why is this article offensive?Where is this article plagiarized from?Why is this article poorly edited? Flag this article
沒有留言:
張貼留言